Person A Attacked by Person B of Cult B
Have you seen this on the Internet? Person A says some things that expose cult B and person B in that cult. Person A is banned and silenced from venues that B has influence over. Cult B or person B retaliate even to this day against person A. Then along comes person C who claims similar experience to A, but also some things that show he/she is not like person A. For example, C rejects our being tripartite. As usual, person B continues to accuse, now by claiming comments by person C are really from person A. This is called sinning bearing false witness. Logically it is not possible for person C to be person A since person A believes we are tripartite and C does not. This shows that person B is in a state of confusion especially after being considered a cult member in cult B by the courts for losing the vain lawsuit for $136 million.
Person B asked person A to call him at his work and gave the phone number to call. But when A called person B at his "alleged" work he could not be reached, and they knew of no such person. Then Person B says he got fired by person A giving a description of person B at his work place when he called to try to locate who B was. Does it sound like someone is playing games?
I think what is revealed about person B is that he is obsessed with person A exposing B and B's cult so he plays weird games.
Conclusion: both person B and person C are in a cult of modalism. Person A never stepped foot into their cult even once: simply just trying to show that never do we find in Scripture the spirit is confused with the soul, nor is the Spirit and Son confused with the Father in the Trinity.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks