All aliens would need to do to destroy us is destroy our moon which would reek havoc on the planet.
Of course, God would never allow this so aliens don't exist.
If Aliens Existed They Could Easily Destroy Us Which is Why They Don't Exist
All aliens would need to do to destroy us is destroy our moon which would reek havoc on the planet.
Of course, God would never allow this so aliens don't exist.
Lol nice !
Junior Member
I could easily kill a helpless baby. Since I don't I must not exist right?
Flawless logic..
You miss the point. You could kill a baby as your alleged aliens could destroy earth. While you could kill a baby that would not destroy the human race, but aliens if they existed could destroy the human race. Such a construct in my purview is therefore untenable as God would never allow it. Though it could happen under your evil construct of naturalism only reality.Originally Posted by TheLogicalRationalist
If there was an alleged eternity of the past of cause and effects they would have had more than enough time to destroy earth so it should have been destroyed by now. Likewise, you would have had an eternity to kill an innocent baby by now so you should have already done so, but since you haven't that proves nature needs a cause outside of itself, outside of time and space, being uncreated. You're not that bright. I can see that.
Logic unflawed!
Junior Member
You are aware that the US's nuclear arsenal alone could wipe every human off the face of the earth, and make human life on earth impossible for thousands of years due to fallout?
You say this like it is a law of nature or something.Such a construct in my purview is therefore untenable as God would never allow it.
What makes naturalism inherently "evil"?Though it could happen under your evil construct of naturalism only reality.
How are you defining the word "evil"?
Who is alleging this? What is the actual theory or hypothesis are you in opposition to?If there was an alleged eternity of the past of cause and effects
Since I haven't what? Killed a baby? Lived for an eternity? Witnessed aliens destroying the earth?...since you haven't that proves nature needs a cause outside of itself
You're not that bright. I can see that.
Since you were off by a (generous) factor of 168 on a very simple math equation, I'm going to go ahead and just laugh at that comment.
Kind regards: ~Robert~
I disagree. I think still a remnant of humans could survive and hide out.
Absolutely. God is just.You say this like it is a law of nature or something.
Naturalism is evil because rape and murder are part of it. Evil is self-explanatory. For example, it is wrong for you to rape. You would be evil.What makes naturalism inherently "evil"? How are you defining the word "evil"?
Roughly half of atheists I talk to claim there is an infinite regress of cause and effects of nature so they need no God. Of course, they are wrong, because if there was this alleged infinite regress of cause and effects, by that definition, you would have happened already having had an eternity to do so. So nature needs a cause outside of itself, outside of time and space, being uncreated. This uncreated Creator is whom we call God. Essentially that is what Romans 1.20 is say, by observing nature we know God exists.Who is alleging this? What is the actual theory or hypothesis are you in opposition to?
As I already said, "you would have had an eternity to kill an innocent baby by now [if there was this alleged infinite regress] so you should have already done so, but since you [presumably] haven't that proves nature needs a cause outside of itself, outside of time and space, being uncreated."Since I haven't what? Killed a baby? Lived for an eternity? Witnessed aliens destroying the earth?
How So?you were off by a (generous) factor of 168
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks