Nottheworld
10-13-2010, 12:45 AM
Cosmologists are performing mathematical slight of hand, an unwelcome distraction from the serious business of improving on the tried and tested. They say there are as many different quantum theories as there are quantum scientists. Each scientist has created his own idol which points to himself as the center of the universe to separate himself from God, assuming he does not accept Jesus as His Lord and Savior.
Professor Andre Linde of Stanford University says, "What's happening is the authors of these theories are producing one theory after another. Usually the lifetime of the idea is one year after which it is replaced by the new set of ideas, then by another set of ideas, and then still by another set of ideas; not because they want to replace these models, but because the previous versions were disproved by an investigation of other people, so that is something which unless the whole line of research and claims and statements will become more accurate, that is something that undermines the whole idea [or process]."
What I hear Andre Linde saying is too many scientists are going off on their weird tangents instead of sticking with the tried and true models. Do I hear an Einstein?
Linde's theory, called Inflationary Theory, seems to be the best one to him because it smooths out the universe and there was really never a big bang; it was simply inflation going on all the time, like holes in cheese that are formed in swiss cheese. Our universe is just one of those dying moldy holes of cheese. Apparently it is fashionable now to reject the big bang. Christians still believe it. God did it!
But his theory as do all these theories suffer the same problem, if there was an infinite regress, you would have had an eternity to have happened already, having had an eternity to do so AND you would never have existed because there would still be an eternity going on before you could come into being. Eternity in the past is not real. God exists outside of time and space so He is not subject to the problems that exist for an eternity of infinite regress.
Brane theories, universes spawning from black holes and bing bounces are just more theories nobody can agree on. I have an idea. Let's stick with the tried and true...
"Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth," Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, author of Sherlock Homes.
"If all possibilities are impossible, what we consider impossible must be true," Spock on Star Trek.
Professor Andre Linde of Stanford University says, "What's happening is the authors of these theories are producing one theory after another. Usually the lifetime of the idea is one year after which it is replaced by the new set of ideas, then by another set of ideas, and then still by another set of ideas; not because they want to replace these models, but because the previous versions were disproved by an investigation of other people, so that is something which unless the whole line of research and claims and statements will become more accurate, that is something that undermines the whole idea [or process]."
What I hear Andre Linde saying is too many scientists are going off on their weird tangents instead of sticking with the tried and true models. Do I hear an Einstein?
Linde's theory, called Inflationary Theory, seems to be the best one to him because it smooths out the universe and there was really never a big bang; it was simply inflation going on all the time, like holes in cheese that are formed in swiss cheese. Our universe is just one of those dying moldy holes of cheese. Apparently it is fashionable now to reject the big bang. Christians still believe it. God did it!
But his theory as do all these theories suffer the same problem, if there was an infinite regress, you would have had an eternity to have happened already, having had an eternity to do so AND you would never have existed because there would still be an eternity going on before you could come into being. Eternity in the past is not real. God exists outside of time and space so He is not subject to the problems that exist for an eternity of infinite regress.
Brane theories, universes spawning from black holes and bing bounces are just more theories nobody can agree on. I have an idea. Let's stick with the tried and true...
"Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth," Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, author of Sherlock Homes.
"If all possibilities are impossible, what we consider impossible must be true," Spock on Star Trek.