The reason I am responding so specifically to what you say is because the Lord wants me to show you that you have nothing to cling to in your faith.
As I responded, I detailed very specifically your mistaken thinking point by point, well documented for all to see and for you to review at your leisure at any time you like. In response, you can't show otherwise; all you can do is self-declare you have an ability to do so and label many false accusations like your father Satan who also needs no reason when he accuses. I know that you don't in fact have an ability to, because no such ability exists. Therefore, all you can do is be coy. Now, since you have sinned again with accusations you don't have the ability to back up, one can be confident you're just selfishly trying to be couth. This is violating Board Etiquette #1. Please read it. As you accumulate these infractions be cognizant you are getting ever closer to entering into temporary Moderation so that if you get there, you will know you belong there.
Also, this becomes your point of shutting your mind down for the Devil. You're headed to the same destination.
Let's go through the conversation:Also, you are DISHONEST. I gave a link, then quoted a post from it where you said that Mohammed was a liar because he came 600+ years later than Jesus. In your response, you acted as if it was from this very topic, which IT WAS NOT. Please, show some shame. If this is my last post on this site, so be it.
1) I said, "Because nothing in nature happens all by itself, therefore the ultimate cause is that which is uncaused who would be God of the Bible since none can compare to Christ."
2) Then, you said, "Why can none compare to Christ? What's so horrid about Mohammed? He came later? If that's your argument, Buddha lived and taught 500 years before Christ was even born, and Hinduism existed centuries before THAT."
3) My response was, "It is not the time of a person's existence for their cause of their truthfulness or untruthfulness. What a silly idea to bear false witness."
Mohammed contrived his religion, and this is proven by the fact that over 600 years later he said Jesus never died. Since all the documentation we have points to Jesus dying on the cross and nobody in the first century saying otherwise, then Mohammed does not have a leg to stand on. We must conclude then that his contrived religion was devised in hostility to God of the Bible, and he is going to hell.
Buddhism and hinduism are false because you are not going to come back as a chicken or a dog if you sin and receive endless chances to be a human being again, back and forth like a yoyo without real consequences. You get this one life to come to the cross and to believe in God. Even some person on some remote island who never read the Bible (the 66 books) or heard of it could still be saved if he looked up at the mountains and stars and believed in the Creator. Surely, if presented the Word of God, he would accept Christ as his Lord and Savior.
Buddhism also makes no commentary on an uncreated creator, thus shutting the person's mind down to the uncreated creator for selfish idol worship of gods that the flesh indulges itself and which remain a point of separation from God."
4) In response to my first paragraph in 3 above after quoting it, you responded with, "From: http://biblocality.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2108" and you quoted what I said in that link,"First off you should not believe in the god of Islam because he lies to you. He comes 600+ years later and says Jesus didn't die on the cross when all the documentation we have He did die on the cross. Nobody in the first century thought otherwise. Can you find anyone who thought otherwise? What about the second century?"5) I responded with, "Nothing in this link should cause you to believe the time of a person's existence determines their truthfulness. I am glad you couldn't show it," and certainly not the portion you quoted that you had answered 3 with.
6) When I said, "Mohammed contrived his religion, and this is proven by the fact that over 600 years later he said Jesus never died,"...
7) You responded by saying, "That bit was from this topic [i.e., this thread]."
8) Obviously, so I said, "You brought it up".
What is dishonest about this? You don't say, but accuse mindlessly. Where was it that I, using your words, "acted as if it [your quote of my words from that link] was from this very topic [i.e., this thread]"? You know very well I was just requoting it. Your misreading on purpose is your problem. You said "IT WAS NOT" from this thread, but where did I say it was? You are bearing false witness. Having put you to "shame" as you like to say, why don't you just repent and get back on topic about the fact that you still can't find anything wrong with the 4 Step Perfect Proof for God of the Bible.
Your problem is you are trying to be cunning through your "petty self" when you made an issue of me quoting the same quote you quoted from that link. You brought it up, and I repeated what you brought up. What you're trying to do is deflect away from the actual subject matter with such nonsense so as to shut your mind down from accepting the truth. Through God's redemptive design by the power of the cross and the Holy Spirit, may God deliver you from your petty self but first you need to be born-again.
Bookmarks