Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Is Free Will a Myth?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Church of
    Sherwood Park
    Posts
    3,515
    Blog Entries
    30
    Rep Power
    27

    Default Is Free Will a Myth?


    Posted on June 20, 2007 - Last Updated on January 13, 2008
    Although there are many Calvinist teachers who deny that man has a free will, the very term "freewill" is used in Scriptures such as Leviticus 22:18, Numbers 15:3, Ezra 3:5 and Ezra 7:16, which mention "freewill offerings". If man does not have a free will, then it really would not make much sense for these to be called "freewill offerings".

    Also, if man did not have a free will, then there would be no just basis for the condemnation of the wicked, because it would make God the author of sin rather than man (that is my greatest concern about the idea that we don't have a free will).

    Everyone May Come
    According to the Bible, God wants to save the wicked (See Isaiah 55:7). And the Bible also tells us that we all have a wicked nature, which is why we all need God in the first place (See Jeremiah 17:9-10). But those whom He cannot save are the ones who are not willing to be saved (See Matthew 23:37). On the other hand, God is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance (See 2 Peter 3:9).

    So it is evident that all may come to Him, which is why Jesus said, “Come to Me, all you who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest” (Matthew 11:28). Is it only the elect who labor and are heavy laden? I don't think so. Jesus was obviously saying this to "all". But those whom He cannot give rest to are the ones who have chosen, by their own free will, to reject Him: “you are not willing to come to me that you may have life” (John 5:40).

    It would be a mockery for Jesus to condemn anyone for not coming to Him if they do not have the free will to do so. What would be the point in condemning those who are not even able to come to Him? As I said, without free will there would be no just basis for the condemnation of the wicked, and that should be evident by now. So this idea that we do not have a free will really makes God look like a monster, and that is my greatest concern about this.

    Can Love Be Forced?
    If man did not have a free will, then we simply would not be able to love God. To love another, it is not a matter of mere power, and human experience itself shows us that. For example, we cannot force someone to love us no matter how powerful we may be, because it must be a choice that comes from their heart. It is really the same way with God: He simply cannot force us to love Him no matter how powerful or sovereign He is (and I do believe that He is sovereign), because it is simply not a matter of mere power, but it must be a choice that comes from our heart - otherwise it is simply not love.

    Does Free Will Give Us A Reason To Be Proud?
    Many people imagine that free will gives us a reason to boast or to be proud, so I can understand why such people would be concerned about the doctrine of free will. However, please consider the following illustration....

    Imagine if you were taking a swim one day, and suddenly you see a shark in the water coming after you. Suddenly, a man pulls up next to you in a motor boat, and he reaches out his hand to save you. You have the choice to either let the man save you or to stay in the water and be eaten. If you reached out to let the man save you, would that give you a reason to boast or to be proud? Of course not!

    Since that is the case, we certainty do not have a reason to be proud about letting God save us from our wretched sinful nature either. Although we agree to let Him save us, it is still Him alone who does the saving. So free will does not give us a reason to be proud as many imagine. Our wills are ours so that we can make them God's. And although I believe that we have a free will, I also believe that our will has been regenerated once we have been born again, which means that we cannot lose our salvation. So I am neither a Calvinist nor an Arminian, but I believe that both of those theology systems are in error.

    The Gift Of God
    Although Calvinism teaches "irresistible grace", Acts 7:51 makes it clear that the Holy Spirit can be resisted. So is it possible to resist the Holy Spirit without resisting the grace that He gives? I don't think so.
    In my article titled The Gift Of God, I explained that a gift, by it's very nature, is not worked for. But faith in God is not a work: Romans 4:5 very clearly makes a distinction between faith and works when it says, “to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness”.

    In my article titled The Gift Of God, I also mentioned that a gift is received rather than worked for. It would not be a gift if we did not have the free will to receive it, and the Bible itself even says “as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God” (John 1:12).

    It is very clear through that verse that regeneration does not come before faith. You receive Him first, and then you become a child of God. This is what is meant by “believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved” (Acts 16:31)! Through that verse, it is very clear that you believe on Him first, and then you are saved. And since faith is not a work, we have no reason to believe that this gives us a reason to be proud.

    The Bondage Of The Will?
    Many Calvinists claim that man's will is in bondage, and Martin Luther even wrote a book titled "The Bondage of The Will". While I commend Martin Luther for the reformation, and I am also grateful that God used him to write one of my favorite hymns (A Mighty Fortress is Our God), I have to respectfully disagree with his teaching that man's will is in bondage.

    On the contrary, the apostle Paul wrote, “the good that I will to do, I do not do; but the evil I will not to do, that I practice. Now if I do what I will not to do, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me. I find then a law, that evil is present with me, the one who wills to do good (Romans 7:19-21).

    Throughout that passage, it is very clear that Paul was willing to do good, and willing not to do evil. So his problem wasn't that He could not will to do good, but his problem was that he was in bondage. Although he willed to do good, it was he himself who was in bondage, not his will! He went on to say “O wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death? I thank God - through Jesus Christ our Lord!” (Romans 7:25)

    So, although Paul could indeed will do good, his problem was that there was still sin dwelling in him (See Romans 7:20 again). But since he did will to do good, he trusted Jesus to deliver him from his body of death in spite of his current condition. Rather than stating that he could not will to do good, Paul wrote, to will is present with me, but how to perform what is good I do not find” (Romans 7:18). Through that verse, it is clear that his problem was not that he could not will to do good, but his problem was that he had not yet found how to perform what is good.

    More Food For Thought
    I believe that I have said enough on this subject for now, but I will now leave you with these final words by A.W. Tozer and the apostle Paul....
    "God sovereignly decreed that man should be free to exercise moral choice, and man from the beginning has fulfilled that decree by making his choice between good and evil. When he chooses to do evil, he does not thereby countervail the sovereign will of God but fulfills it, inasmuch as the eternal decree decided not which choice the man should make but that he should be free to make it....Man's will is free because God is sovereign.... A God less than sovereign...would be afraid to...bestow moral freedom upon His creatures. God moves undisturbed and unhindered toward the fulfillment of those eternal purposes which He purposed in Christ Jesus before the world began... with infinite wisdom and perfect precision of action. No one can...turn Him aside from His plans. Since He is omniscient [and] sovereign...there can be...no accidents...no breakdown in authority; and as He is omnipotent, there can be no want of power to achieve His chosen ends . . . . Within the broad field of God's sovereign, permissive will the deadly conflict of good and evil continues with increasing fury. God will yet have His way [but] as responsible beings, we must make our choice in the present moral situation." A.W. Tozer (1897-1963), from The knowledge of the Holy - also available as an audio book
    “Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men. For as by the one man's disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man's obedience the many will be made righteous”. (Romans 5:18-19 - The English Standard Version)

    RESOURSES ON CALVINISM
    WHAT LOVE IS THIS?
    WHAT IS SALVATION?
    MY HOME PAGE

  2. #2
    Nec Guest

    Default

    I believe we do have free will and think that Calvinism's teaching of predestination is wrong because it doesnt explore the essence of free will, but at the same time, predestination is mentioned multiple times in the bible (Eph. 1:3-5, Rom. 8:28-30).

    What I am thinking is that when it comes to predestination, God knows our choice. He predestines on the basis of foreknowledge of how some will respond to his universal love (he knows whether we will reject his love or embrace it).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    6
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    In order for choice to be meaningful and morally significant, it must be deliberate. To make a deliberate choice is to contemplate a set of options (e.g., chocolate or vanilla pudding) and to instantiate that which enjoys the greater degree of our desires (e.g., chocolate pudding), whether those desires are rational or emotional or some concert of both. If we evaluate this series closely, we realize that our choices are a function of our conative faculties; for example, the choice of chocolate pudding is a causal chain that is propagated and filtered through the motivational complex of our desires. This is why choices of the will always reveal the character of the person. The causal chain runs through the agent's conative faculties, not irrespective of them (libertarianism) but concordantly with them. Put in other words, the volitional activity of our will actively shapes this causal chain, as opposed to passively responding to a causal chain (determinism). We are not puppets. Nothing makes our choices for us. We make our own choices. Although our will is determined or "causally necessitated," it is so in the right way by forces internal to the choice-maker, not external. We know from the laws of nature that determinism is real, but we also know from the human experience that choice is real. Compatibilism is the theory that takes both seriously and articulates them as co-existent realities.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    93
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    14

    Default

    Free will doesn't need to be deliberate though, it could be as something as simple as gesture without even thinking about it as a person creates habits.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Atheists Have Free Will
    By InTruth in forum Atheist/Agnostic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-20-2009, 06:23 PM
  2. Romans 9 - Free-Will
    By Churchwork in forum Totally Depraved
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-04-2009, 08:10 PM
  3. Mozart was a Free-Mason
    By Churchwork in forum Theosophy
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-14-2007, 03:47 PM
  4. Did Jesus have free will?
    By indigo in forum 66 Books-God's Word
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-02-2007, 06:47 PM
  5. Free Masons Not So Free...
    By Scriptur in forum Theosophy
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-07-2007, 02:54 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •