No it isn't. Digital code is binary, DNA is quaternary.
Darwinian evolution is the theory that explains how modern biological diversity arose from simple self-replicating molecules over ~3.5 billion years.
First, there is no such thing as 'information in the code'. Second, I need only point out the existance of point insertion mutations to refute this point.
Hence why ID is unscientific: it does not acknowledge all possibilities.
We are complex, certainly. But complexity does not imply design.
Nope. It is a demonstratable fact that things can be 'designed' without a designer.
How so?
Scientists try to explain given phenomena and/or data in the most scientific way possible (i.e., by being parsimonious, etc). No possible explanation is omitted, but those that are indistinguishable from parody are obviously not considered.
Bookmarks