An accuser who is not convinced in God being triune (God the Father, God the Spirit, God the Son, or that hell is an eternal separation from God) has his contentions, which I will address below.

If we have the truth, why aren't we apostles? Isn't it just a gnostic special knowledge? They like to use the word "gnostic" to accuse, because it is a derogatory term as well as vaguely unusable to respond to since the accuser showed no courtesy in being specific.

They also accuse, an apostle is one who has a following in a community. My answer, in another thread, was because there is not even 12 in agreement visibly seen as in the first century, so how can you have indepedent moves in a community and calling that apostolic, which is smaller than a Biblical locality? God does not divide according to anything smaller than a Biblical locality, nor does He divide on a basis larger than a Biblical locality.

Otherwise, that's what creates the party spirit of sects and denominations and cults. We already have enough of these copouts! Do we really need more of them? After all, we are in the Laodicean church period of "differing opinions", and we have been in this period for at least a hundred years now. Enough already!

The solution is, you need twelve in agreement, at least, to start to recapture the first love lost of Ephesus in the first century. If it was good enough for Jesus, it is good enough for us. Praise the Lord!