The importance of Paul is his time spent with Peter, James and John that they all held the same eyewitness testimony and imparted to Paul. Since their lying is not plausible, nor did Paul, what naturalistic explanation is there?
The importance of Paul is his time spent with Peter, James and John that they all held the same eyewitness testimony and imparted to Paul. Since their lying is not plausible, nor did Paul, what naturalistic explanation is there?
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Bookmarks