Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Braxton Hunter vs. Daniel Alvarez Debate on Proof for the Existence of God

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    232
    Blog Entries
    4
    Rep Power
    19

    Default Braxton Hunter vs. Daniel Alvarez Debate on Proof for the Existence of God

    True Faith is Proven Faith
    Agnosticism is False Humility - Unbridled Skepticism

    Daniel Alvarez says there is no evidence for God but had a conversion experience when he was 7 years old and claims to believe in Christ. How can you reject God's existence and still claim to believe in Jesus?

    The Holy Spirit reveals the answer that the experience Daniel had was a supernatural evil spirit that deceived him and thus, he by faith worships a false Christ so he is going to Hell.

    The proof for the uncreated creator is most easy. Something can't come from non-existence. And infinite regress is impossible, because you would have had an eternity to come into being before now, so you should have already happened. Therefore, nature needs a cause outside of itself, outside of time and space, being uncreated. This uncreated Creator is whom we call God.

    The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. (Ps. 14.1) Without faith it is impossible to be well-pleasing unto him; for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that seek after him. (Heb. 11.6)

    Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it speaketh to them that are under the law; that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may be brought under the judgment of God: because by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified in his sight; for through the law cometh the knowledge of sin. (Rom. 3.19-20)



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    46
    Blog Entries
    4
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    When will the evidence ever be enough for Daniel Alvarez?

    It seems to me this can go on forever, because even if Daniel knew all things, but there was one thing he didn't know, he would still use that as excuse to reject God.

    What he seems to be saying selfishly so is in order to prove God, Daniel must be God, but of course, Daniel is not God, and never will be God so his approach is fallacious.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 4 Step Proof for God of the Bible
    By Churchwork in forum Science
    Replies: 149
    Last Post: 07-25-2014, 12:56 PM
  2. God's Perfect Proof
    By Scriptur in forum Atheist/Agnostic
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-14-2014, 04:03 PM
  3. Regarding the 4 Step Proof for God
    By Marquis Naryshkin in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-07-2011, 10:08 PM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-27-2009, 04:33 PM
  5. This is Essentially God's Proof of Himself
    By Churchwork in forum Gap Restoration
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-19-2007, 01:23 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •