There is nothing wrong with giving speeches, but the money the Clintons gets for speeches is from corporations that give money to Bill's foundation which is used not for charity but by Clinton to pay off government leaders to get mining rights in their countries and for other nefarious intentions by wealthy individuals and corporations.

Clinton is basically the middle man. It is apparently unethical to directly give Clinton a finders fee so it is all veiled under the false pretense of giving speeches to line Clinton's pocket. Toronto Dominion gave Bill Clinton $2 million for 10 speeches because TD has an investment in the XL Pipeline while Hillary had direct power over deciding its fate.

Or a corporation under investigation by the US gov't for selling technology to Libya is taken off the list when that corporation gives Clinton several million for $750,000 speeches. What a deal! Back to business as usual. National security is thrown out the window because it lines the Clintons' pockets.

There are ethical ways to make a living then there are unethical ways.

Or some despotic leader who murdered thousands of his citizens is pronounced by Bill Clinton to be a great leader of humanitarian rights in order to get mining rights in his country. Whoever gives Clinton the most money gets those mining rights. Whoever doesn't give Clinton the most money doesn't get those mining rights. That's the way it works.

And the list goes on and on and on. Many more examples were given. The relinquishing of American uranium interests is another national security issue that Bill orchestrated and sabotaged. The long held moral positions they have had as Democrats has been reversed because in reversing their positions their business model makes them rich.

I am not convinced there is no other way these mining companies are going to get into other countries by paying their corrupt government leaders through the Clintons. We can demand transparency of funds given to countries.

If you think this is a necessary evil of doing business then it is all justified. But if you think charity can be done in a more responsible way then you can reject this business model of the Clintons. So the Clintons won't get as much money. I am perfectly fine with that.

Even Doland Trump would not stoop this low. Of course, they behave this way because they reject Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. As the Bible says, we shall know them by their fruits.