There is really no evidence to disprove or prove this. Anything that happened after the Big Bang are only superstition. The thing is that >ANYTHING< could have happened. Your argument is more that, since X can't have always existed - then it HAS to be like this. The only "true" answer we can say as of yet is "maybe". Think of it like this.Nothing can come from nothing - therefore something (God) must have created the universe and existence itself.
If a tree fell down in a forest but none saw it - then we may agree that something caused it to fall down. Maybe it was a very strong wind that fell it, maybe it was an earthquake, maybe the tree was very old and frail and just crushed itself with its own weight.
You are basically saying "since the tree was not seen by anyone - then X must have occurred due to Y and Z". But that does not PROVE your point. We don't know if nature have always existed, nor do we know if this "meta-existence" where this God is exists either. It just may be that everything exists just for no sake at all.
That is a very powerful sentence right there - "It just may be that everything exists just for no sake at all".
Two words: Quantum Physics.We observe trillions and trillions of cause and effects in nature, and no hard evidence something from nothing. Nothing always leaves nothing from nothing.
Bookmarks