I'll address your opening comment since all your other comments flow from your first mistaken thought. Arminians don't believe in libertarian free will since we believe all our choices are within God's divine providence. Why does one person choose Christ and another not? Because God made us sovereign free willed beings in His image, thus we have the choice. Since you reject this God you are going to Hell. It is not that a person is inherently better since we have all received sufficient grace to have the free choice. You've made the choice to reject God so to Hell you will go and lock yourself from the inside. It's what you want. This universe God created saves the most and damns the least. Any other world ensemble a person would not be saved that is not saved in this world. Calvinism is wrong because God does not irresistibly impose salvation. We are talking about initial salvation. Of course there is the matter of overcoming that follows. And Craig and the Roman Church are wrong since obviously when God saves a person He does so eternally. Craig thinks he could lose eternal life tomorrow. That would be a strange kind of eternal life one which a person can get saved, lose it, get it back only to lose it again. This is a works based salvation like other religions. Craig is going to Hell. It's easy to see as was just explained.

If there is a person who would not be saved in every possible world then it only shows that person nothing could convince him as God saves the most and damns the least. He truly belongs in Hell. In fact it is true everyone who goes to Hell does so because there is no world in which they would accept Christ. That is their choice. God never prevents the creation of someone who would be saved on account of someone who does not want to be saved.