Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: A Non-OSAS Posttribber Onlyist, Water Baptism Legalizer

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,033
    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bogus_donut View Post
    he's blocked me.
    Isn't it unethical to have double standards? since the only reason I blocked you on You tube is because you first blocked me. I didn't want to keep getting messages from you while you were sending me messages. How is that Christlike to want a one way street?

  2. #2
    bogus_donut Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Parture View Post
    Isn't it unethical to have double standards? since the only reason I blocked you on You tube is because you first blocked me. I didn't want to keep getting messages from you while you were sending me messages. How is that Christlike to want a one way street?
    You approached me first and I replied saying I didn't want an e-mail debate and got further e-mails trying to bait me, then actually insulting me, so I blocked you. You started this thread to attack me too. Then you did it again with another account. I have nothing to hide, that's why I invited you to publish full transcripts, but I guess you don't want brothers and sisters to see the insulting way you spoke to me. I have quoted your full replies in this thread. I also notice my threads on here being edited by you for "not being cordial". That's a hoot! I'd like to see what you deleted, because I was polite. If you can't be honest, don't post and don't edit mine with another account (with the same name as the second You Tube account name); not very subtle lol.

    Go on, post the transcripts. I don't think any members have bothered with your thread anyway.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,033
    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bogus_donut View Post
    You approached me first and I replied saying I didn't want an e-mail debate and got further e-mails trying to bait me, then actually insulting me, so I blocked you. You started this thread to attack me too. Then you did it again with another account. I have nothing to hide, that's why I invited you to publish full transcripts, but I guess you don't want brothers and sisters to see the insulting way you spoke to me. I have quoted your full replies in this thread. I also notice my threads on here being edited by you for "not being cordial". That's a hoot! I'd like to see what you deleted, because I was polite. If you can't be honest, don't post and don't edit mine with another account (with the same name as the second You Tube account name); not very subtle lol.

    Go on, post the transcripts. I don't think any members have bothered with your thread anyway.
    This is saved for the future whereby you can continually be exposed. Your post was not edited by this account which doesn't have permissions. You can't remember what was posted? I guess it wasn't that important, but certainly worthy of removal for being uncordial, considering the part that was not removed was also uncordial for your first post. I assume by "subtle" you mean sneaky like you, but I am not trying to hide anything. Perhaps you're just projecting your own condition of being sneaky.

    I didn't approach you but you responded to a general post I put on Youtube, then when you responded revealing your false teaching, I replied to you to help show you where you went wrong. Instead of dealing with those verses, you went on a rampage.

    As you kept trying to rationalize your view without ever dealing with the Scriptures, I responded to show you that kind of behavior is dishonest and disingenuous. Nobody is baiting you, nobody is insulting you. As you kept sending me messages, I kept showing you that you were wrong by the Scriptures then you shut your mind down further by blocking, so I blocked in kind. What was unethical of you besides that was you accused me of blocking you after you blocked me first. You are trying to be sneaky. I just didn't want you to keep sending me messages when I was not allowed to reply.

    The purpose of this thread is to expose you since after several exchanges it was clear you are never going to give your life to Christ. It was time to expose you. You're exposed. Lying by accusing I am insulting you is just more unethical games. I have posted everything and have left nothing out. If I insulted you then you are free to show it, but stop accusing of insulting you when you have nothing to back it up. You're like a clanging bell who never needs to prove anything.

    The forum policy is for a new user is to start off with a cordial post. I started off this thread to expose you which I am allowed to do. But you still haven't posted a cordial post yet. Obviously you don't care to be Christlike. You're here just to show your hatred and your obvious unwillingness to deal with the Scriptures which show you are going to Hell.

    You really are a bogus donut. I don't take kindly to your dictatorial way of being. Have you noticed that about yourself? The idea is to prove something you say, not just usurping yourself with pontifications.

  4. #4
    bogus_donut Guest

    Default A good thread about pre-trib onlyist doctrine.


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,033
    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    I believe in partial rapture. I am the one who posted that link you gave. Just as posttribber onlyism is false so is pretribber onlyism.

    You're not paying attention to what is being shown. Your behavior is getting increasingly more ignorant. As would be expected since you are not born-again. You are a non-OSASer, that is, you believe in salvation by works or self-strength. What a weird salvation to think you can get eternal life, lose it, get it back again only to lose it again. God simply rejects your nonsense and won't save you to begin with as you stir around in your delusion.

    By the way I also noticed your profile you reject God's word when it mentions laying on of hands as well as baptism by water (figurative) since not all saints were baptized in water, and often there was no water around in their travels in the desert. Baptism by water is figurative for dying to the world with Christ and coming up out of the world and with Christ. Obviously, you don't have this sense in you to come out of the world, banging on your drums like a wild animal.

    How can you die to the world if you are of the world? How can you be baptized by water and the Holy Spirit if you are not even in Christ?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 73 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 73 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Paul's Baptism (No Mention of Water)
    By Finestwheat in forum 66 Books-God's Word
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-07-2011, 12:44 PM
  2. How Will the Pretribber Onlyist Be Deceived?
    By Parture in forum Partial Rapture
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-25-2009, 10:09 AM
  3. Baptism of Water and the Spirit
    By AlwaysLoved in forum OSAS Arminian
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-12-2009, 08:38 PM
  4. Baptism With or Without Water
    By Churchwork in forum 66 Books-God's Word
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-10-2006, 04:10 AM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-09-2006, 09:21 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •