Did you know that all we have to go on to prove the resurrection of Christ or other matters are archaeological finds, documents, and eyewitness accounts?

So in determining whether something happened or didn't happen, it is important to realize that there is a limited number of means in which to prove the facts.

If we can come to a conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt, then we can be reasonably confident it happened. The finding of historicity is essentially a default position; thus, we have no other reasonable way to account for the presence of the story of the text.

What the external historical certainty of Jesus' resurrection does is reinforce that God's Spirit has indeed spoken to us and gives assurance we experience really from God's Spirit.

Jesus predicted His resurrection so many times and was multiply attested. If you want evidence for this, please ask.

We observe the principle of dissimilarity in the term "the Son of Man" that Jesus used for His resurrection. We also notice the principle of embarrassment in how the disciples did not seem to have a clue what Jesus was talking about regarding His resurrection.

The effectiveness of Jesus' prediction about His resurrection stands if the resurrection is true.