The point of my statement concerning the heart is that I obviously do not consider it to be anything more than a fleshing pulsating object, why would you opinion of that object affect me in any way?

Secondly we do not see only causation in nature. We see plenty of things that have no known cause. We do not know the cause for what makes photons behave like they do, nor do we know the causes for bosons or gluons. One could go on to say that we do not know the cause for what makes quarks or leptons act like they do either and thus we do not know the cause for anything, but all we can do is see them do what they do to explain and predict that. This fact makes your entire causes argument silly...

No if everything had a cause I would not be teaching infinite regress at all. Why would I teach infinite regress if everything had a cause?