The Sins of Baptists and Calvinists

The calvinists and the baptists are part of the Sardis Revivals in the 15-18th centuries, but this is like emptying a glass of water then fill it up again but with less water each time. This is the characteristic of these so-called revivals.

The calvinists like to call themselves Reformed, but they are not Reformed. They are unreformed! All 5 points of calvinism are false. Man is not totally deprave, since if that were true, he could not choose the cross but would need to be premade like a robot to be saved first before he could believe. Naturally then the 4 other points of calvinism fall apart.

Man is not unconditionally elected as that robot, nor is he under a limited atonement just for robots. Nor is grace irresisted by those robots. So there is not perseverance of robots preprogrammed for salvation.

Baptists are usually 3 point calvinist, 2 point osas arminian. They hold the false teaching of total depravity and the false teaching of unconditional election (imputed righteousness rather than imparted righteousness). But those two ideas contradict resistible grace, unlimited atonement and preservation of the saints (eternal life at new birth in God's predestinating by His infinite foreknowledge our free-choice).

Luther had this same confusion as do Baptists and was notoriously confused. Luther began as a limited atonement guy, but then changed to unlimited atonement. Many say Constantine was calvinist, but some of his writings point him to being osas arminian. John Wesley was non-osas arminian which is wrong. Whitefield was calvinist which is wrong. Arminius himself seemed to be right, for he was osas arminian. That is, he believed God predestinates by foreknowing (Rom. 8.29) our free-choice (John 3.16): a conditional election, unlimited atonement, resistible grace, for preservation of the saints. Arminius is noted as saying that he believed in OSAS, except that it only seemed like some verses point to non-OSAS, not that he believed in non-OSAS. What he failed to realize was that those verses actually pertain to loss of rewards in the millennial kingdom.

Baptists are also wrong because they legalize baptism, demanding physical water. But Paul allowed for baptism with or without water in burial and resurrection with Christ to come out of the world.

The conscience of Baptist is seared by puffing up self over physical water. And Baptists and Calvinists have a conscience seared by the pride of thinking they were premade for salvation to be saved first before they could believe to come out of total depravity. They puff themselves up with this special teaching.