Church of Satan Exposes The Evil in Atheism

Church of Satan Exposes The Evil In Atheism

Atheism is a dangerous worldview. Obviously, atheists will vehemently deny this claim. No sane human will agree that their worldview is evil. But a proponent of atheism reveals atheism as an evil worldview.

To say that atheism has an innate propensity to perpetrate evil is not to assert that religion is a peaceful worldview. Killers do represent religion. There are rank evil people professing to some religion or the other.

Reality also reveals many morally upright atheists. What makes an atheist a good person?

Christians claim that atheists could be good because God’s law is written in their hearts (Romans 2: 15). Contrarily, atheists believe that the rules of sociology, psychology, and neurophysiology enable their good behavior.1

A Christian will be a good person if he loves and obeys the Lord Jesus Christ. Christ did not teach us to hate each other rather love each other.
What makes a religionist an evil person?

From within a Christian perspective, if a Christian remains a namesake Christian without any love for the Lord and the knowledge of God’s Word – the Bible, then he could succumb to evil. Such a Christian would have succumbed to the deception of the Satan.

Evil Christians are not Christians to begin with. Those who have succumbed to Satan’s deceptions to perpetrate evil are Satan’s disciples, not Christ’s disciples.

Other than denying God, what is innately wrong with the atheistic worldview that it motivates atheists to be evil? (Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot are famous atheists who ruthlessly murdered millions of people.)

If atheists believe that rules of sociology, psychology, and neurophysiology enable their good behavior, then it’s reasonable to deduce that corruption in sociology, psychology, and neurophysiology would entail evil. (How would an atheist explain the corruption that enters sociology, psychology, and neurophysiology to motivate evil from its adherents? What is the nature and source of that corruption? Let’s not enter that metaphysical domain now!)
Say hello to the Church of Satan!

Do not be surprised by the rules of existence of the “Church of Satan,” which is published on their website, “When walking in open territory, bother no one. If someone bothers you, ask him to stop. If he does not stop, destroy him.” “If a guest in your lair annoys you, treat him cruelly and without mercy” (Emphases Mine).2

“If he does not stop, destroy him” ????

“… treat him cruelly and without mercy” ????

How does the Church of Satan justify destroying people? This is their justification, “Satan represents vengeance instead of turning the other cheek!”.3 The Church of Satan does not believe in the biblical version of Satan i.e. Satan is a living spiritual being.

Satanists or the members of Church of Satan are self-centered atheists, “Satanists are atheists. We see the universe as being indifferent to us, and so all morals and values are subjective human constructions.

Our position is to be self-centered, with ourselves being the most important person (the “God”) of our subjective universe, so we are sometimes said to worship ourselves. Our current High Priest Gilmore calls this the step moving from being an atheist to being an “I-Theist.”

Satan to us is a symbol of pride, liberty and individualism, and it serves as an external metaphorical projection of our highest personal potential. We do not believe in Satan as a being or person” (Emphasis Mine).4 The fundamental belief of the Church of Satan exposes atheism in all its glory.

When atheists deny God, they affirm man. (Do they have another option?)

When atheists deny [the sovereignty of] God, they affirm the sovereignty of man. The Church of Satan blatantly declares that man is sovereign, “Our position is to be self-centered, with ourselves being the most important person (the “God”) of our subjective universe, so we are sometimes said to worship ourselves.”5

When sovereignty of man is affirmed, subjectivity invades the domain as a consequence. The Church of Satan affirms subjectivity, “We see the universe as being indifferent to us, and so all morals and values are subjective human constructions.”6

By affirming and subscribing to subjectivity, the Church of Satan offers itself absolute freedom to determine its own rules and policies. In fact, the Church of Satan plays God by offering itself absolute freedom via its justification of man’s sovereignty.

If man declares himself as sovereign, he gives himself the powers to kill and to destroy. This is the source of ruthless dictatorship or ruthless man.
Atheism, in its essence, is capable of gross ruthlessness.

Lack of a common belief system, a consequence of negating objective truth, is another reason why atheism could be a dangerous killer, “The only common thread that ties all atheists together is a lack of belief in gods and supernatural beings. Some of the best debates we have ever had have been with fellow atheists. This is because atheists do not have a common belief system, sacred scripture or atheist Pope. This means atheists often disagree on many issues and ideas. Atheists come in a variety of shapes, colors, beliefs, convictions, and backgrounds. We are as unique as our fingerprints.”7

When atheism negates objectivity and upholds man’s sovereignty, subjectivity or relativism is a natural entailment. “Every man for himself” is their motto.
Thanks to Richard Dawkins, every man is free to dance to the music of his DNA. Every man is free to hypothesize and establish the rules of his sociology, psychology, and neurophysiology. Sociology, psychology, and neurophysiology become prisoners of atheists.

Within the atheistic worldview, what seems evil to one atheist could be conceived as the greater good of another atheist. On what grounds would you argue with those who perpetrate evil under the assumption that their contentious act is essentially not an evil act?

Consider child sex abuse as a case in point.

Thankfully the Church of Satan believes in not harming children, “Do not harm little children.”8 The American Psychological Association (APA) also considers sexual abuse of children as a harmful practice, “sexual relations between children and adults are abusive, exploitive, reprehensible and properly punishable by law.”9

But NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association) believes that consensual sexual relationship between a man and a boy is beneficial to the boy!10 Significantly, the American Psychological Association does not refer to consensual sex between man and a boy as being beneficial to the boy. Whether consensual or not, sexual relations between boy and a man is an abuse and a disorder – an evil deed.

But this is my point; what’s evil to APA is not evil to NAMBLA.

How would you resolve this situation under an atheistic worldview that subscribes to man’s sovereignty and subjective moral laws? At best, these organizations could debate this matter endlessly. Even if one deems the other as evil, the other could find justification from within the atheistic worldview to justify the evil.

The scope for evil’s rule is much greater if atheism prevails. If Christianity as a religion perpetrates evil, then it is a gross misrepresentation of Christianity. Evil is not inherent in Christianity. But evil is a natural entailment of atheism.

Christianity cannot, by any means, justify evil. But atheism can justify evil.

http://christianapologeticsalliance....il-in-atheism/

How true this article is! Atheists are willing to talk about atheism in their atheology and develop that theology of theirs' to their hearts' content, but no talk of God is allowed, no talk of beliefs or faith or religion outside that. When I say "no talk of God allowed" what is meant is no talk for God or for Jesus. But the atheist is more than willing to share his hostility against God and against Christ. If you are willing to engage in this behavior with the atheist then by all means, join the club says the Atheist.

This is an unethical doublestandard!

The article is about the varying views of atheism. They can't seem to agree on much. Some atheists might think having sex with a 14 year old is a sin, others might think 16 or 18 even 21. Consensual pedophilia is a sin, but not necessarily to the Atheist because it is consensual. Most atheists are in favor of homosexuality. No Christians are! And since atheists lower the bar on pedophilia like they do for same sex or even sex with animals, we have a hard and concrete example of the immorality of Atheists.

The atheist has no objective reference or standard of truth, because the ideas that go through an atheist's mind are all valid depending on your flavor of the month and changing tides; or, the needs of nature! There is no reason why one idea might stand the test of time and others not. Whereas in Christianity we have Scripture that can pinpoint what is objective truth through a clear understanding of God's word in the 66 books of the Bible. Even if the government permitted sex with 14 year olds, Christians would hold fast against this crime. Whereas the Atheist could say sex with 14 year olds is permissible because the population needs to procreate more otherwise the human race will expire.

An interesting example of this is found in the tv series, "The Leftovers." About 2% of the population is raptured, and those remaining on earth try to rationalize their existence why they were not taken but left (1 Thess. 4.14-18 ASV). Some scientists discover a way using radiation to make a person vanish leaving the same trace elements as in those who were really raptured. People give up a great portion of their wealth to receive this simulated raptured. There is one qualifying question given to everyone which is: "Image there are twins. One will grow up to cure cancer but only if the other dies in their childhood. Would you permit the latter to achieve the former? If the person answered Yes then they were denied the vanishing treatment." The point being, you need to be of a purer conscience for it to work. Perhaps the trace elements are more like the raptured if you answer the question correctly. Take the red pill in the Matrix. The blue pill is for Atheists. So in Atheism pedophilia is permitted under some circumstances for natural reasons. Under Christianity no circumstances would permit this. Therein lies the difference.

In my experience I have discovered that the atheist will retaliate and even try to destroy you if you mention reasons why atheism is immoral and false. So be ready for the fallout when you speak your mind by the Holy Spirit. You're going to be a casualty of Christianity, though you will be greatly rewarded as Luke 6.22 says.

Watchman Nee wrote on Polycarp,

A first-century Christian leader named Polycarp was arrested. The proconsul urged him to swear by the genius of Caesar and say, “Away with the atheists.” He caught up the last words of his judge. With solemn visage, and looking up to heaven and waving his hand, Polycarp cried out: “Away with the atheists.” The proconsul, perhaps mistaking this as a sign of yielding and recanting his Christian faith, pressed him further: “Swear, and I will set thee free; revile Christ.” His answer is memorable: “Four-score and six years have I served Him, and He hath done me no wrong. How then can I speak evil of my King, who saved me?” All threats and seductions alike having proved powerless, the proconsul announced to the assembled multitude that Polycarp had confessed himself a Christian. Whereupon the pyre was readied and heaped up. There he offered up his last prayer—words of praise and thanksgiving that God had deigned to accept him that day as a sacrifice well-pleasing to Him.

The atheist may try to put on a friendly face, but he is really festering underneath. Be careful around him. He has you a target on your back now. He'll act strangely towards you from now on, behaving weirdly and even estranged.

These matters don't just vanish once the communication has ended. They will always rear their ugly heads upon any meeting, because ultimately the atheist is going to Hell because he rejects Christ and thinks we came into existence from nothing; or, the universe always existed. That's crazy! Crazy ideas lead to other crazy ideas, another way of saying what the Bible says, "sin begets sin!"

Something can't come from nothing for that which does not exist can't cause anything (non-existence can't bring something into existence), and infinite regress of nature is impossible, because if it were true, you would have happened already, having had an eternity to do so.

Think how challenging this is for the Christian because the Christian is restricted by the thought police (Atheists) which Christians are required to regulate themselves, or be defriended and shunned like the Apostles were. Satan is the god of this world and imposes such lording over others to further his agenda against God. Some atheists allow 10% content against Atheism, others allow 40%, while others allow 80%. It depends.

It get's worse. The Atheist will say you can discuss anything else "except that religion" referring to Christianity. Not only are they targeting Jesus in particular, but they are also restricting discussion on anything that the word of God has a say on. For example, you can't talk about why homosexuality is evil, because the word "evil" implies God's judgment. There is no such thing as evil in atheism. The atheist doesn't want to be judged by God so they pretend God does not exist. The only way to ensure He does not exist is to disallow any discussion on any number of subjects that Christians are hard pressed to leave out God our Creator and His redemptive design.

Some I have come to know allow 0% while they have no such restriction they place on themselves to express their occasional anti-God and antichrist comments. You can't even say the word "sin;" you can't use any analogies or parables in the Bible, you can't quote Jesus, and Genesis does not exist, etc. The historicity of religion is blocked out and Christianity is a large portion of that. If you don't sense the evil in this, you need to get a conscience! The vast majority of human experience is denied by the impotence of atheism, for the fear of being judged by God is their motivation.

Again, this is an unethical doublestandard!

As Watchman Nee aptly wrote,

To recapitulate what was said earlier, all things have been created by God who is the sole source of all things. He is also above all things (see Acts 17.24-25). As men witness these created things all about them, they worship God. It is therefore wrong and foolish for the human mind to invent atheism. The things in the heavens and the earth lead us to the knowledge of God (Rom. 1.20). Yet because all these things are so varied and complex, God’s enemy Satan attempts to unite them into one [statistically currency], for he recognizes how impossible it is to sum up so many different things in God’s creation.

God’s things come from God. So far as He is concerned, the created things which come from Him are not at all for sale. For all is grace. The sunlight, for example, cannot be measured, and it need not be paid for—since He causes it to shine on the unrighteous as well as on the righteous: His grace even causes the rain to fall on them both, without cost to anyone (Matt. 5.45).

Someone said, “I need not argue with you. If you simply stop doing these bad things and begin to live more morally, God will immediately return.” How factual that is, for many fail to believe in God not because they have good reasons to do so but simply because their multitude of sins hinders them from believing. They are compelled to be atheists.

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. (Ps. 14.1)

Without faith it is impossible to be well-pleasing unto him; for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that seek after him. (Heb. 11.6)

Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it speaketh to them that are under the law; that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may be brought under the judgment of God: because by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified in his sight; for through the law cometh the knowledge of sin. (Rom. 3.19-20)

The most famous atheist our generation finds "mild pedophilia" acceptable.

https://www.theatlantic.com/internat...-again/311230/

Atheists are tweaking with pedophilia blurring lines,

https://www.algemeiner.com/2011/08/2...t-is-too-late/

I reiterate my “plea” to atheists

Michael Ruse and I do agree on one thing. Once the atheist realizes that all of his noble moral principles are nothing more than subjective feelings – “no more than liking or not liking spinach” – then “pretty quickly it would break down…very quickly there would be no morality.” Actually, it’s not that there would be “no” morality. It’s just that the moral values would change according to societal whim.

I repeat my original plea to atheists:

“The choices before us are clear: we will either seek a transcendent moral law to which we will all submit, or we will seek our own personal and societal indulgence. If we turn to God in our quest to create a moral and just world, we have a fighting chance; if not, we are doomed to spiral into the man-made hell of the human jungle.”

Atheism stands for nothing, signifies nothing, and affirms nothing except for one thing: All the moral aspirations of the advanced primate we call a human being are nothing more than a cosmic joke….and not a very funny one at that.

Atheists are pedophiles because nature provokes a person to do something in atheism. If nature under no God deems it necessary for pedophilia then so be it. The subjective decision to permit pedophilia is unacceptable under any circumstances. You can claim you are a not an atheist pedophile, but the laws of nature insist that you are because there is no objective truth. What you believe right now can easily change as nature imposes its will on your life. Whereas in Christianity our objective truth is "God" no matter what demands nature places on us.

Homosexuality, what most atheists believe in, is a gateway sickness to pedophilia.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mmkj...ature=youtu.be

"Anyone who hates a brother or sister is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life residing in him" (1 John 3.15).

Likewise, if you are an atheist then you are pedophile and a homosexual. Hate is murderous just as atheism is subject to a natural only world based on societal whims and relativism as we have seen in the past. As the past shows these whims occur even in individuals that live in a society that consider these crimes.

It's irrelevant if the Atheist denies he is these things, for nature demands it upon him so that he is these things. He doesn't even have to act them out. The fact that nature condones it (with many examples available) in atheism means he condones it as a product of his natural only world.